Wednesday, 5 October 2005

Web 2.0 Tagging Study, Part 2: Private vs. Public Tagging

« (D)Evolution 2.0 | Main | Web 2.0 Tagging Study, Part 3: Timing of Read vs. Write »

Last week I posted part 1 of the Simpy tagging study, where I looked at how much we tag. That study showed that Simpy users are hard-core taggers, tagging nearly 99% of all links. We also learned that almost all tags are single word tags, with only 2% of all tags being multi-word tags.

While most Social Bookmarking services, including del.icio.us1, force their users to expose all their links to the public, Simpy lets users mark links as private. No, that does not mean that Simpy is anti-Web 2.0 and openness, it just means I want to give people the control over their own data. The natural questions to ask are: How many people use these features? How many links are actually private in Simpy? And the answer is in the following figure.

Apparently, about 7.3% of all links in Simpy are private links. Apparently, some non-negligible portion of Simpy members do like to keep their links to themselves, and I bet they are not all p0rn links.

Once I found out that a little less than one tenth of all links are private, I started wondering whether there is any difference in tagging behaviour when people tag their private links vs. their public links. After all, they must have some good reasons to keep certain links private, so maybe this affects how they tag them. After a bit of investigation, this is what I came up with:

As you can see, there really is some difference in tagging behaviour when people tag their private tags. Public links have, on average, 4.94 tags associated with them. I believe this is a pretty high number of tags per link, and supports my earlier statement that Simpy users are quite hard-core taggers and are building a very rich Folksonomy. I would love to see numbers from other services. Anyone? But what about tags for private links? Indeed, private links carry even more tags - 6.63 on average. Can we draw any conclusions from this? If we assume that the number of tags associated with a link indicates the importance of the link, we could say that private links are, on average, more valuable to people, as people put more effort into tagging them by coming up with more tags.

So much for private vs. public analysis. If you have some other ideas or requests for additional types of analysis, feel free to email.

In the next study I'll look at chronology of different aspects of activities found in a Web 2.0 Folksonomy service such as Simpy.

[1] I'm sure Joshua & Co. are working hard on private links.

Posted by otis at 5:47 PM in /

Comments on this entry:

Left by Sean at Wed, 5 Oct 10:26 PM

This has been a great series. It is very interesting to see some of the statistics from Simpy. I would love to see some other random stats...which url has been posted the most, what is the most common tag (both single and multi word), I would also be curious to see over a few days what number of links are posted, and how many are unique.

Regardless, its a great series, thanks.

Sean

Left by Martin at Thu, 6 Oct 12:55 AM

Good bit of info so far Otis. I always preferred multi-word tags myself, and I wonder why people would use single words. Maybe people don't know they can use multi-word tags? I think the fact that some services separate tags by spaces instead of commas or other more sensical means, affects this. I remember the first time I used del.icio.us for example, I had this problem. I think also that many people still do not know how to tag because it's still a new concept (though something we use to remember information about real world items all the time). Looking forward to seeing more from this series.

Left by Saurier at Sun, 9 Oct 9:50 AM

It'd be interesting to see a figure filtered by whether people use the private option or not.

(maybe people who do, also use more tags for their public links than those who don't.)

Left by Bill at Fri, 3 Mar 1:58 AM

It\'s a very good site !! Very nice work, admin :) Good luck !

Left by Billy at Fri, 3 Mar 3:02 PM

It is healthy, I shall come on your site more often, thank.

Left by Billy at Fri, 3 Mar 3:09 PM

Very good site, greate content !!

Left by Kir at Fri, 3 Mar 6:38 PM

It is healthy, I shall come on your site more often, thank.

Left by JeyZee at Fri, 3 Mar 10:12 PM

Good work, webmaster! Nice site!

Left by Hakee at Sat, 4 Mar 5:15 AM

It\'s a very good site !! Very nice work, admin :) Good luck !

Left by Nelly at Sat, 4 Mar 5:24 AM

Very nice design ;) Good work,webmaster!

Left by Tanya at Sat, 4 Mar 9:53 PM

nice site !Good content,beautiful design, thank! ericsson ringtones

Left by Damn at Sun, 5 Mar 3:52 PM

� good site, good short contents of the good work. I have loved your site :D

Left by Hakee at Mon, 6 Mar 12:49 AM

I think your site is very good and complete, but the information you have here

Left by Rustie at Mon, 6 Mar 9:41 AM

Hello admin, nice site you have!

Left by Neo at Mon, 6 Mar 9:57 AM

Very interesting site, beautiful design, thank.

Left by Billy at Mon, 6 Mar 4:21 PM

Yo have nice site, admin! keep up good work man!

Left by Diesel at Mon, 6 Mar 5:58 PM

Your site is very very cool !! I love it :) Respect !

Left by Funkie at Mon, 6 Mar 9:02 PM

It is healthy, I shall come on your site more often, thank.

Left by Nelly at Mon, 6 Mar 10:50 PM

Pool Tables For Sale

Left by Frank at Tue, 7 Mar 12:01 AM

Keep a good work man!

Left by Heel at Tue, 7 Mar 4:51 AM

Yo have nice site, admin! keep up good work man!

Left by Arnie at Tue, 7 Mar 11:38 AM

Your site is very nice :) Respect to admin !

Left by Jessicas at Tue, 7 Mar 11:42 AM

Great web-site,admin! Very informativity! antique furniture

Left by Tifany at Tue, 7 Mar 6:10 PM

Very interesting site, beautiful design, thank.

Left by Sasha at Wed, 8 Mar 12:27 AM

Your site is very very cool !! I love it :) Respect !

Left by Nelly at Wed, 8 Mar 6:58 AM

It is healthy, I shall come on your site more often, thank.

Left by Arnie at Wed, 8 Mar 1:25 PM

Very interesting site and beautiful design !! Thank.

Left by JAJA at Sat, 13 Sep 9:02 AM

JAJA, UPYACHKA! UG NE PROIDET, BLYA!

Your comment:

(not displayed)

Answer 3 + 4 =

 
 
 

Live Comment Preview:

 
« October »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Powered by blojsom